Skip to content

Conversation

@Turbo87
Copy link
Member

@Turbo87 Turbo87 commented Oct 4, 2024

This makes it easier to use async-only APIs in the admin tools and convert more functions to use diesel_async internally.

@Turbo87 Turbo87 added C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear A-backend ⚙️ labels Oct 4, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 390 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.96%. Comparing base (828f52e) to head (13dd11a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/admin/render_readmes.rs 0.00% 77 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/enqueue_job.rs 0.00% 61 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/delete_version.rs 0.00% 59 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/delete_crate.rs 0.00% 46 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/upload_index.rs 0.00% 43 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/default_versions.rs 0.00% 21 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/migrate.rs 0.00% 21 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/test_pagerduty.rs 0.00% 18 Missing ⚠️
src/bin/crates-admin.rs 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
src/admin/verify_token.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
... and 3 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9579      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.10%   88.96%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         289      289              
  Lines       29057    29101      +44     
==========================================
  Hits        25890    25890              
- Misses       3167     3211      +44     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Turbo87 Turbo87 merged commit 429e1be into rust-lang:main Oct 4, 2024
10 checks passed
@Turbo87 Turbo87 deleted the async-admin branch October 4, 2024 13:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-backend ⚙️ C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant